HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGISTIC METHODS FOR DETECTION OF TEGUMENTAR PERFORATORS THAT CAN BE USED IN RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY OF TISSUE DEFECTS. PIG EXPERIMENTAL MODEL

Authors

  • Bogdan CHIROIU Clinic Hospital of Recuperation Cluj-Napoca, Deparment of Medical Imaging Radiology
  • Alexandru GEORGESCU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Haţieganu” Cluj-Napoca, Department of Plastic Surgery
  • Ileana MATEI University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Haţieganu” Cluj-Napoca, Department of Plastic Surgery
  • Stelian PETCU University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Haţieganu” Cluj-Napoca, Department of Medical Imaging Radiology
  • Ionel PAPUC University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca, Discipline of Semiology, Ethology and Diagnostic Imaging
  • Radu LACATUS University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca, Discipline of Semiology, Ethology and Diagnostic Imaging

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52331/cvj.v15i1.10

Keywords:

perforator flap, perforator vessel, ultrasound, experimental, pig

Abstract

Tissue defects still determine a high surgical interest in finding new and more efficient methods of covering. Perforator flaps are considered one of the most important methods of reconstruction, for defects all over the body. Anatomists, surgeons, radiologists are fervently searching ways to improve their reliability and also strategies to ensure that the chosen flap to be used is the best for that case. It has been proven that tissue defects’ reconstruction involves knowing the exact anatomy and physiology of various vascular sources, but there are still unknown factors that sometimes induce perforator flaps failure.

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate by two imagistic methods the perforator vessels in an experimental model of perforator flaps in pig.

Methods: The imagistic method employed was the X-ray angiography and Color Doppler vascular ultrasonography with high performance equipment. The explored perforators were located on the body of the experimental model, that was divided in 9 regions and the comparison was made between the perforators identified by imagistic methods and by microsurgical careful dissection.

Results: This study revealed that the average sensibility of ultrasound per region was 52.66% and the average sensibility of angiography per region was 35.30% on the entire lot.

Conclusion: The Color Doppler ultrasonography is a very reliable method for detection of the perforator vessels, with better results compared with X-ray angiography, detecting even the smaller perforators. So, the surgeon can rely the operative planning on this preoperative vascular exploration.

References

Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan P. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique and Clinical Applications. Vol. 2. 1st ed. St. Louis,MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2006:1042

Chiroiu B., Georgescu Al., Petcu S., Papuc I., Lacatus R., Matei I.Explorări imagistice de înaltă rezoluţie a vaselor perforante tegumentare folosite în chirurgia reconstructiva a defectelor de substanţă. Model experimental pe sobolan –Lucrari stiintifice seria Medicina Veterinara. 2009;52(11):451-458

El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The vascular anatomy of the lower anterior abdominal wall: a microdissection study on the deep inferior epigastric vessels and the perforator branches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:539–543.

Falca C., Ciorba GH.: Tehnici de examinare clinică si paraclinică la animale, editia a II-a, Editura Mirton, Timisoara, 2005

Forbes PD.Vascular supply of the skin and hair in swine, in Montagna W. and Dobson RL., Advances in Biology of the Skin. Pergamon, New York. 1969.

Kerrigan CL., Zelt RG., Thompson JG., Diano E.:The pig as an experimental animal in plastic surgery research for the study of skin flaps, myocutaneous flaps and fasciocutaneous flaps. Lab.Anim.Sci. pag.408-412, 1986

Knight KR., Collopy PA., O’Brien BMcC. Correlation of viability and laser Doppler Flowmetry in ischemic flaps. Journal of Reconstructive Surgery, (43), pag.444. 1987.

Kohn DH., Wixson SK., White WJ.: Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. Academic Press, New York. 1997.

Matei I., Georgescu Al, Chiroiu B., et al Harvesting of forearm perforator flaps based on intraoperative vascular exploration: clinical experiences and literature review –. Microsurg 2008;28(5):321-330.

National Research Council. Subcommittee on Swine Nutrition.Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 1998.

Papuc I., Lăcătus R.: Semiologie si imagistică medicală veterinară, Editura Accent, Cluj-Napoca, 2004.

Papuc I.: Anatomie comparată. Vascularizatia membrelor la unele mamifere pentadactile, Ed. Gedo, Cluj-Napoca, 2000.

Sack W.O. Essentials of Pig Anatomy and Horwitz/Kramer Atlas of Musculoskeletal Anatomy of the Pig. Veterinary Textbooks, Ithaca, New York. pag. 192, 1982.

Sasaki GH, Pang CY. Pathophysiology of skin flaps raised on expanded pig skin, Plast. Recontr. Surg., 74(1), pag.59-67. 1984.

Schaller O. Illustrated Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature, Enke, Stuttgart, 1992.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-16

How to Cite

“HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGISTIC METHODS FOR DETECTION OF TEGUMENTAR PERFORATORS THAT CAN BE USED IN RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY OF TISSUE DEFECTS. PIG EXPERIMENTAL MODEL” (2009) Cluj Veterinary Journal, 15(1), pp. 50–56. doi:10.52331/cvj.v15i1.10.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)