Impact of early phytobiotic and prebiotic supplementation on growth performance trajectories in broiler chickens: a time × treatment interaction study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52331/v31i13975Keywords:
Keywords: broiler chickens; phytobiotics; prebiotics; early-life nutrition; growth performanceAbstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of early dietary supplementation with phytobiotic (nettle flour) and phytobiotic–prebiotic (alfalfa flour) additives on the growth performance of Ross 308 broiler chickens. A total of 90 one-day-old chicks were allocated to three dietary treatment groups (control, nettle, and alfalfa), each consisting of 30 birds in three replicates of 10 birds. Feed additives were administered during the first 7 days post-hatch, followed by a common basal diet across all groups until day 35. Body weight was recorded on days 7, 21, and 35. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA with interaction, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, and Welch's ANOVA to account for heteroscedasticity and non-normal distributions.
Significant treatment effects were observed at all time points, with a marked divergence emerging by day 35 (F(2, 87) = 138.78, p < 0.0001). Post-hoc analyses confirmed that nettle flour led to the greatest increase in body weight compared to both the control and alfalfa groups (p < 0.001). The alfalfa group exhibited a moderate but statistically significant effect (p < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA revealed a strong treatment × time interaction (F = 90.93, p < 0.0001), indicating that the efficacy of the additives varied across developmental stages. OLS regression confirmed the robustness of the model (R² = 0.957), with the "Nettle × Day 35" interaction contributing an estimated +715 g gain in body weight over the control.
These findings highlight the potential of short-term early phytobiotic and prebiotic supplementation to produce long-term enhancements in broiler growth performance. Nettle flour, in particular, demonstrated superior efficacy, suggesting its potential as a functional feed additive in intensive poultry systems.
References
References:
1. Abd El-Ghany W.A. (2020). Phytobiotics in poultry industry as growth promoters, antimicrobials and immunomodulators – a review. Journal of World’s Poultry Research 10(4): 571–579. https://doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2020.65
2. Abd El-Ghany W.A. (2024). Applications of organic acids in poultry production: an updated and comprehensive review. Agriculture 14(10): 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101756
3. Chudak R.A., Barabash S.D., Poberezhets J.M. (2024). The influence of phytobiotics on the productivity and reproductive system of repair young laying hens. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences 26(101). https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a10107
4. Gheisar M.M., Kim I.H. (2017). Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition – a review. Italian Journal of Animal Science 16(1): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1350120
5. Gumowski M., Ceccopieri C., Madej J.P., Leicht K., Korzeniowska M., Lipińska A., Sierżant K., Konkol D., Różański H., Asghar M.U., Korczyński M. (2025). The use of phytobiotics in the form of complexed organometallic phytoncides and micronized herbs in the nutrition of Ross 308 broiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, meat quality, and immune response. Animal Feed Science and Technology 326: 116391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116391
6. Islam R., Sheikh I.U. (2021). Phytobiotics in poultry production. In: Recent Research in Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Volume 2, pp. 13–36. Integrated Publications, Delhi, India. https://doi.org/10.22271/int.book.71
7. Khatun A., Das S.C., Ray B.C., Ahmed T., Hashem M.A., Khairunnesa M., Roy B.C. (2023). Effects of feeding phytobiotics on growth performance, breast meat quality, blood biochemical indices, and liver enzymes of broiler chickens. European Poultry Science 87: Article 374. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2023.374
8. Mohammadigheisar M., Kim I.H. (2017). Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition – a review. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1350120
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adrian Cimpean

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


