Development of a Pilot Behaviour-Based Stress Screening Framework for Dogs and Cats During Veterinary Consultations

Authors

  • Andrei-Sebastian Csiplo University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca
  • Silvana Popescu University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52331/v31i3rj25

Keywords:

companion animals, behaviour, animal welfare, stress, veterinary consultation

Abstract

Veterinary consultations are commonly associated with acute stress in companion animals due to transportation, unfamiliar environments, handling procedures, and previous negative experiences. Although behavioural observations are widely used to recognise stress, practical behaviour-based screening frameworks suitable for routine veterinary practice remain limited. The aim of this pilot study was to identify owner-reported behavioural observations in dogs and cats during veterinary consultations and to develop a preliminary behaviour-based stress screening framework for clinical use. Behavioural data were collected from 50 companion animal owners using a structured questionnaire completed immediately after routine veterinary consultations. Owners reported behavioural responses observed before entering the veterinary practice, immediately after entering, and approximately 10 minutes after entering the waiting area. Behavioural observations were analysed using descriptive statistics according to their frequency and apparent intensity to support the development of a preliminary clinical framework. Attempting escape, fear, trembling, vocalization, and agitation were the most frequently reported stress-related behavioural indicators, while multiple concurrent behaviours were commonly observed, suggesting that behavioural profiles provide more meaningful information than isolated responses. Based on these findings, a preliminary behaviour-based stress screening framework was developed to facilitate rapid clinical interpretation of behavioural observations during routine veterinary consultations. Although further validation using standardized behavioural assessments, independent observers, and larger study populations is required, this pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating structured behavioural observations into routine veterinary practice and provides a foundation for the future development of standardized behaviour-based stress screening methods.

Author Biographies

  • Andrei-Sebastian Csiplo, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca

    Department of Animal Hygiene and Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Rank: PhD Candidate

  • Silvana Popescu, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca

    Department of Animal Hygiene and Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 

    Rank: Professor doctor/ PhD Coordinator

     

References

1. Hargrave, C. Anxiety, Fear, Frustration and Stress in Cats and Dogs—Implications for the Welfare of Companion Animals and Practice Finances. Companion Anim. 2015, 20 (3), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.12968/coan.2015.20.3.136.

2. Overall, K. L. Manual of Clinical Behavioral Medicine for Dogs and Cats; Elsevier Mosby: St. Louis, MO, 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=1431145.

3. Mills, D.; Dube, M. B.; Zulch, H. How Animals Respond to Change. In Stress and Pheromonatherapy in Small Animal Clin-ical Behaviour; Mills, D., Dube, M. B., Zulch, H., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118702642.ch1.

4. Lefman, S. H.; Prittie, J. E. Psychogenic Stress in Hospitalized Veterinary Patients: Causation, Implications, and Therapies. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2019, 29 (2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12821.

5. Koolhaas, J. M.; Bartolomucci, A.; Buwalda, B.; De Boer, S. F.; Flügge, G.; Korte, S. M.; Meerlo, P.; Murison, R.; Olivier, B.; Palanza, P.; Richter-Levin, G.; Sgoifo, A.; Steimer, T.; Stiedl, O.; Van Dijk, G.; Wöhr, M.; Fuchs, E. Stress Revisited: A Criti-cal Evaluation of the Stress Concept. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35 (5), 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003.

6. Sinnott, L. Implementing Strategies to Reduce Stress in the Clinical Setting. In Pract. 2025, 47, 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/inpr.70010.

7. dvm360.com. Veterinarians’ Attitudes About Fear Free Practice: Keep Calm and Fear Free On; 2013. https://www.dvm360.com/view/keep-calm-and-fear-free.

8. Williams, T.; Carroll, A.; Montrose, V. T. Environmental Methods Used by Veterinary Centres to Reduce Stress of Cats and Dogs during Practice Visits. Vet. Nurse 2019, 10 (1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2019.10.1.47.

9. Mosedale, P. Clinical Audit in Veterinary Practice—The Role of the Veterinary Nurse. Vet. Nurse 2019, 10 (1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2019.10.1.4.

10. European Parliament; European Council. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council; 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 (accessed 2026-05-02).

11. Csiplo, A.-S.; Popescu, S. Pet Owners’ Perceptions of Key Factors Affecting Animal Welfare During Veterinary Visits. Ani-mals 2025, 15 (6), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060894.

12. Czycholl, I.; Skovlund, C. R.; Forkman, B. Literature Review of the Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment with a Fixed List of Terms. Front. Vet. Sci. 2026, 12, 1588346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1588346.

13. Polgár, Z.; Blackwell, E. J.; Rooney, N. J. Assessing the Welfare of Kennelled Dogs—A Review of Animal-Based Measures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019, 213, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.02.013.

14. Gazzano, V.; Curadi, M. C.; Baragli, P.; Mariti, C.; Cecchi, F.; Cavallo, S.; Sacchettino, L.; Gazzano, A. Physiological and Behavioral Evaluation of Shelter Dogs During Veterinary Routine Health Checks. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12 (6), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12060583.

15. Jankord, R.; Herman, J. P. Limbic Regulation of Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Function during Acute and Chronic Stress. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1148, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1410.012.

16. Hennessy, M. B. Using Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Measures for Assessing and Reducing the Stress of Dogs in Shel-ters: A Review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013, 149 (1–4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.004.

17. Trevorrow, N. Helping Cats Cope with Stress in Veterinary Practice. Vet. Nurs. J. 2013, 28, 327–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/vnj.12074.

18. Abubakar, A. A.; Kaka, U.; Ngiow, E. W.; Goh, Y. M. Behavioural Indicators of Stress in Cats During Veterinary Visits: Ef-fects of Transportation and Clinical Examinations. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2025, 48 (6), 1817–1829. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.48.6.09.

19. Steimer, T. The Biology of Fear- and Anxiety-Related Behaviors. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2002, 4 (3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2002.4.3/tsteimer.

20. Erickson, A.; Harbin, K.; MacPherson, J.; Rundle, K.; Overall, K. L. A Review of Pre-Appointment Medications To Reduce Fear and Anxiety in Dogs and Cats at Veterinary Visits. Can. Vet. J. 2021, 62 (9), 952–960.

21. Mellor, D. J.; Beausoleil, N. J.; Littlewood, K. E.; McLean, A. N.; McGreevy, P. D.; Jones, B.; Wilkins, C. The 2020 Five Do-mains Model: Including Human–Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals 2020, 10 (10), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

“Development of a Pilot Behaviour-Based Stress Screening Framework for Dogs and Cats During Veterinary Consultations” (2026) Cluj Veterinary Journal, 31(3). doi:10.52331/v31i3rj25.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)