Evaluation of Reproductive Status in Romanian Buffalo Farms Using Ultrasonographic Monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52331/v30i33q42Keywords:
buffalo cows, transrectal ultrasonography, natural mating, artificial insemination, reproductionAbstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive status of buffaloes from two farms in Romania by means of transrectal ultrasonography, with the intent to provide practical insights for both farmers and veterinary professionals. A total of 336–352 buffalo cows were examined at Farm A (Arad County, Romania), and 178–183 at Farm B (Brașov County, Romania), during the spring and autumn of 2024.
Farm A implemented artificial insemination (AI) based on natural estrus detection, while Farm B relied on natural mating, with an approximate bull to female ratio of 1:25. The results indicated superior reproductive performance in Farm B, demonstrated by a shorter calving interval (428–431 days) and a reduced service period (125–129 days), in comparison with Farm A (445–448 days and 136–142 days, respectively; p < 0.05). The average number of inseminations per conception in Farm A was 1.6–1.7, and the incidence of postpartum endometritis was slightly higher (1.0–1.2%) than in the naturally mated group (0.3–0.5%).
Transrectal ultrasonography proved indispensable for the accurate diagnosis of gestational stages, ovarian structures, and uterine pathologies, enabling the classification of buffaloes into well defined reproductive groups. These findings suggest that, under local management conditions, well structured natural mating can surpass the efficiency of standalone AI, highlighting the importance of accurate estrus detection, strict hygiene protocols, and periodic reproductive monitoring in optimizing fertility and overall herd productivity.
References
1. Matiuti M, Matiuti CL, Garlea C, Huţu I. Particularities of buffalo breeding in Romania. One Health International Journal, 2020; 6(1), p. 2. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23304.24323
2. Iovănescu C. Contributions to the study of buffalo behavior in Transylvania - PhD thesis, 2007 p. 35
3. Popa R, Popa D, Vidu L, Pogurschi L, Maftei M, Nicolae C. Economic weight of production traits for Romanian buffalo. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science. Vol. LXI, Number 1, 2018 ISSN 2285-5750; ISSN CD-ROM 2285-5769; ISSN Online 2393-2260; ISSN-L 2285.
4. Vidu L, Diaconescu C, Bacila V, Popa R, Popa D, Stanciu M. The herd size and production performances of buffalo in Romania. Buffalo Bulletin · January 2013.
5. Vidu L, Georgescu Gh, Udroiu A, Ungureanu M, Vlăsceanu F. Study upon qualitative parameters of buffalo milk on a population in the south of Romania. The 36th International Session of Scientific Communications, November 2007, p.14-16.
6. Archunan G. Reproductive enhancement in buffalo: looking at urinary pheromones and hormones. Iran J Vet Res. 2020 Summer;21(3):163-171. PMID: 33178293; PMCID: PMC7608042.
7. D'Occhio MJ, Ghuman SS, Neglia G, Della Valle G, Baruselli PS, Zicarelli L, Visintin JA, Sarkar M, Campanile G. Exog-enous and endogenous factors in seasonality of reproduction in buffalo: A review. Theriogenology. 2020 Jul 1;150:186-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.044
8. Neglia G, de Nicola D, Esposito L, Salzano A, D'Occhio MJ, Fatone G. Reproductive management in buffalo by artificial insemination. Theriogenology. 2020 Jul 1;150:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.016.
9. Choudhary KK, Kavya KM, Jerome A, Sharma RK. Advances in reproductive biotechnologies. Vet World. 2016 Apr;9(4):388-95. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.388-395.
10. Perera, B.M.A.O. Reproductive Cycles of Buffalo. Animal Reproduction Science 2011, 124(3–4), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.022
11. Coman S, Berean DI, Cimpean R, Ciupe S, Coman I, Bogdan LM. Clinical Modalities for Enhancing Reproductive Effi-ciency in Buffaloes: A Review and Practical Aspects for Veterinary Practitioners. Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(18):2642. doi: 10.3390/ani14182642.
12. Perera, B.M.A.O. Reproductive Cycles of Buffalo. Animal Reproduction Science 2011, 124(3–4), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.022
13. Zicarelli, L. Reproductive Seasonality in Buffalo. Bubalus Bubalis 1997, 4, 29–52.
14. Das GK, Khan FA. Summer anoestrus in buffalo--a review. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010 Dec;45(6):e483-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01598.x.
15. Karen A, Darwish S, Ramoun A, Tawfeek K, Van Hanh N, de Sousa NM, Sulon J, Szenci O, Beckers JF. Accuracy of ul-trasonography and pregnancy-associated glycoprotein test for pregnancy diagnosis in buffaloes. Theriogenology. 2007 Nov;68(8):1150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Sep 19. PMID: 17884156.
16. Ali A, Derar DR, Abdel-Razek AK. Ultrasonography for the detection of pregnancy and study of embryonic and fetal development in camels, buffaloes, and sheep: Techniques, equations, and limitations. Anim Reprod Sci. 2024 Sep;268:107566. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107566.
17. Karen AM, Darwish S, Ramoun A, Tawfeek K, Nguyen VH, de Sousa NM, Sulon J, Szenci O, Beckers JF. Accuracy of transrectal palpation for early pregnancy diagnosis in Egyptian buffaloes. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jan;43(1):5-7. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9675-2.
18. Balhara AK, Gupta M, Singh S, Mohanty AK, Singh I. Early pregnancy diagnosis in bovines: current status and future directions. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Dec 5;2013:958540. doi: 10.1155/2013/958540.
19. Warriach HM, McGill DM, Bush RD, Wynn PC, Chohan KR. A review of recent developments in buffalo reproduction - a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;28(3):451-5. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0259.
20. Zicarelli L. Enhancing reproductive performance in domestic dairy water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2010;67:443-55. doi: 10.7313/upo9781907284991.034.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Daniel Berean, Stefan Coman, Raluca Cimpean, Simona Ciupe, Liviu Bogdan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
